The “5 E’s” are not created equal

For several decades, transportation professionals have advocated the “4 E’s” (more recently, they are “5 E’s”). Indeed, Boulder transportation staff, at countless meetings I attended, solemnly and triumphantly assured the Transportation Advisory Board I served on that they were implementing the “5 E’s.” All was well in terms of our improvement methodology, therefore, in transportation for Boulder, we were led to believe.

But the mantra implies that each of the “5 E’s” are equally important. This is absolutely untrue. It is a false equivalency. The “E” of engineering for safer, more attentive streets is, by far, the most important tactic for achieving Boulder transportation objectives. The other four (education, evaluation, enforcement, and encouragement) are helpful, but do not come close to the effectiveness of revising streets through engineering.

A much more accurate way of stating this concept is to state that there is one primary “E,” engineering, and four secondary “E’s.”

About Dom Nozzi

Urban designer, Complete Streets instructor, smart growth specialist, town planner, walkable streets and bikeable streets and trails specialist, writer, editor, public speaker, world adventurer, skier, kayaker, SCUBA diver, bicyclist, hiker, dancer, book reader, cook, urbanist.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s